Why Science Needs Art

Why Science Needs Art


you know in astronomy we rely heavily on
or visual intuition because of course because is not an experimental science
we cannot go exactly the place where these two objects are actually merging so this is for example a
collaboration between artists and astrophysicists in trying to
understand well how can I explain to myself into the public what’s
happening because it’s certainly you know train my brain into look at
things in a very different way so now can see a three-dimensional
visualization and they try to understand basically the
physics in a different way because I have tools that I didn’t have before of how to look at a phenomena so high so to
play to be an alchemist with a computer

5 thoughts on “Why Science Needs Art

  • January 27, 2015 at 5:02 pm
    Permalink

    You know what they say, the earth without "art" is just "eh"

    Reply
  • January 27, 2015 at 6:07 pm
    Permalink

    Never thought of it like that!

    Reply
  • January 27, 2015 at 7:25 pm
    Permalink

    Serious question: are all visualizations considered art? Does that includes charts and graphs as well? I'm not disagreeing with what was said here, but I have to admit that I imagined a completely different video when I read the title.

    I wouldn't have previously considered these sort of data driven models to be art, even if they are sometimes beautiful, since their primary purpose is utilitarian. But that is why I ask the question, because I could be wrong.

    Reply
  • January 27, 2015 at 10:36 pm
    Permalink

    I'd love to see the dancers that Enrico collaborated with as referenced by the popup graphics!!

    Reply
  • September 8, 2015 at 2:27 pm
    Permalink

    so science needs art so that we can explain to ourselves what we discover in an easer way ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *