Paul vs Faul. The fake photos

Paul vs Faul. The fake photos


Hello there beetle fans I first got these two albums the red and the blue when I was about ten years old And I’d spend hours just listening and looking at their pictures and I’ve always thought they sound so different I’ve always wondered is it the same person on both of these records? They’re more recently. I was getting to the poor for conspiracy The conspiracy goes Paul was replaced in 1966 62 to 66 and I realized These are the two poems here They’ve shown us in plain sight the red paw and the blue paw The red album is poor one The blue album is Paul to red poor blue Paul Let’s look closer So there’s red Paul, he’s got the big ears He’s like a triangle shapes got a strong jaw. But if you look at his eyes, you can see a kind angelic soul Now it turns out a lot of photographs on the internet have been doctored in some way Paul has a very wide face strong chin and his nose is quite eye up and It’s a big gap between his lips and his nose Blue poor he’s got a bigger nose more of a beaky nose And the eyes are different too if we look at red Paul we can see those Angelic brown eyes and notice that his right eye is leaning down to the side now if we look at blue Paul his eyes we can see that is a more level and Noticeably more bags on to the eyes Although blue Paul on the right is actually a different Paul We can see that the hair and ears are pretty much the same and what they’ve done in this picture is change the faces If we look at a more recent picture of blue Paul UPDATE. RED PAULS NOSE SHOULD BE SHORTER RED PAULS NOSE IS FAKE Two pictures from the cavern way back when the beetles were wearing the leather outfits Now if you look closely we have the red ball on the left, but the blue paw has been changed somebody has changed these pictures and changed Paul into an older version with the 50s air do And of course another noticeable difference in these two photographs are the eyebrows red Paul as much Angelic eyes with the slanting down right eye and the gaps between their eyes are very different too now We’re starting to see the differences between the red Paul and the blue Paul I’d like to show you the most important picture now. This is the smoking gun What we have here is red Paul blue Paul These two pictures are exactly the same but with different eyes the red Paul on the left taken around 65 66 you can clearly see that blue Paul has exactly the same body and air if you look closely you can see the eyes and the nose have been changed Blue Paul as he’s startled eyebrows red. Paul has a shorter nose and a slotted right eye Why did they do this? This is an interesting photograph You can clearly see red Paul with his angelic eyes blue Paul with these more wrinkly eyes These two photographs were taken at the same time, but you can see that they’ve switched the faces You can see the picture of blue Paul here is obviously looks older than red Paul Now this picture of red Paul and blue Paul is also interesting we can see on the left We got the red Paul with his why the ears and his angelic face on the right We’ve got blue Paul this photograph has so obviously been altered you can see the year shading around his hair which doesn’t quite fit and I’ve noticed that John’s arm has suddenly disappeared You BTW knows I’d like to show you this next photograph to show you just how subtle these changes are You can clearly see these two photographs are virtually the same. But again, we’ve got blue Paul on the right and a slightly different face and Red Paul on the left is still got his angelic eyes. There’s also tonal differences on these photographs Sixty-two to sixty-six Sixty-two to sixty-six Sixty-two to sixty-six And I realized On this beautiful 3d graphic we can see Paul’s face clearly changing from 66 to 67 I think there’s something going on here and This beautiful 3d graphic. I think shows us two different people. The years changed face grows narrow Cheekbones lifts The beat was have always left us clues in their photographs The red and the blue album it’s right there in front of us plain sight I’m making this video so that we’ll never forget the first poll You You

100 thoughts on “Paul vs Faul. The fake photos

  • April 25, 2019 at 3:31 pm
    Permalink

    wow , great observations and you're right v subtle but they mess up , they actual enhancethe details and thus differences.

    Reply
  • April 25, 2019 at 5:33 pm
    Permalink

    My newest song is DON'T FAUL FOR PAUL and it is going great folks! It will be on my newest release coming soon! STAY TUNED! Great video here and it's pretty obvious why they quit touring in 1966 and why they did those 2 albums RED and BLUE!

    Reply
  • April 25, 2019 at 8:54 pm
    Permalink

    This video shows quite clearly that these are 2 different people. I wish Billy Shears would come clean and admit he has been masquerading as Paul McCartney. This has been a lie that has gone on far too long !

    Reply
  • April 25, 2019 at 9:21 pm
    Permalink

    This is friggin lame get a life finding conspiracy where there is none

    Reply
  • April 27, 2019 at 9:34 am
    Permalink

    Hehehehehe

    Reply
  • April 27, 2019 at 3:41 pm
    Permalink

    Have you never heard of ageing? It’s the same person, the pictures are just different angles and the boys moving whilst the pictures where being taken!

    Reply
  • April 27, 2019 at 8:25 pm
    Permalink

    Stop this please….4 the love of God…please…this old folklore is so played out…its not a different person….its Paul McCartney….who gives a fuck anyway when we've had 52 years with this impersonator lol

    Reply
  • April 27, 2019 at 9:00 pm
    Permalink

    What I notice the most is the personality change! Sir Paul is a pompous ass. I never liked Wings and wanted to.. sad we are lied to about so many things

    Reply
  • April 27, 2019 at 10:04 pm
    Permalink

    Thank you so much from Oklahoma in America. A very, very accurate, and Intelligent approach. Plus the pictures, especially the three d pictures, are really conclusive proof. Nice job brother.

    Reply
  • April 28, 2019 at 12:09 pm
    Permalink

    1.40… Red Paul look.like Pete Doherty

    Reply
  • April 28, 2019 at 3:55 pm
    Permalink

    Thankyou

    Reply
  • April 28, 2019 at 6:40 pm
    Permalink

    Queer drool.

    Reply
  • April 28, 2019 at 9:14 pm
    Permalink

    What a pile of crap you people do need to get a life Paul never died idiots Paul is very much alive and laughed at all this crap one day I just hope he starts to take legal action yes the first Paul was and is the only Paul idiots believe anything

    Reply
  • April 28, 2019 at 9:26 pm
    Permalink

    Why must we endure Faul… somebody, somewhere can bring the truth to light!

    Reply
  • April 29, 2019 at 7:51 am
    Permalink

    Not doctored, 2 Pauls whom are always concurrent..clip at 4.01 is from the NEMS Office footage, its footage not just photos, both Pauls are there, watch the footage. The pics are NOT doctored, there simply always was and still is 2 Paul's.

    Reply
  • April 29, 2019 at 9:00 pm
    Permalink

    Paul lives.

    Reply
  • April 29, 2019 at 9:33 pm
    Permalink

    I can't stand McCartney but, for fucks sake,

    Reply
  • April 30, 2019 at 3:45 am
    Permalink

    Just compare their ears. The real Paul's ears are wide, but Faul's ears are narrow. Fake Paul is none other than Billy Shears from Scotland.

    Reply
  • April 30, 2019 at 4:33 am
    Permalink

    I will never understand humanity. Elvis died but for many people he is alive. Paul is alive but many people say he is dead.Who understands people

    Reply
  • April 30, 2019 at 5:34 pm
    Permalink

    What a load of old bollocks!!!

    Reply
  • April 30, 2019 at 6:11 pm
    Permalink

    I agree. There must have been two Paul McCartneys because no single human could possibly have written that many great songs.

    Reply
  • April 30, 2019 at 7:43 pm
    Permalink

    5:14 He got the face of George

    Reply
  • May 1, 2019 at 1:22 am
    Permalink

    Dude are you high? People change as they age.

    Reply
  • May 1, 2019 at 4:35 am
    Permalink

    I grieve for the original Paul. Fake Faul stole everything from him, even memories of Paul's past .

    Reply
  • May 1, 2019 at 9:07 am
    Permalink

    So we have multiple photos of Paul , which we then alter to have the impostor inserted in his place , but in turn he has had to have been altered to look like the original ! Sounds like a solid theory.

    Reply
  • May 1, 2019 at 10:55 am
    Permalink

    It's all bullshit.

    Reply
  • May 2, 2019 at 3:50 pm
    Permalink

    Forget the clues, etc. "Stage Presence" is the key. Paul on stage is clearly not Faul on stage. Anyone who saw Wings knows Faul couldn't carry Paul's Bass Guitar, couldn't sing Paul's lines, it just wasn't Paul. Paul was the most dynamic performer in history. Faul was kind of a performance slug with Wings. I've seen Faul many times, and he improves everytime as a performer, but he still can't match the original Paul. No one could.

    Reply
  • May 3, 2019 at 3:36 am
    Permalink

    Foolish thing!

    Reply
  • May 3, 2019 at 5:10 am
    Permalink

    If you can't see these are clearly two different people then there's something wrong with your eyes or your just a very unobservant person. Some people who know sets of twins can easily tell the difference and some people get mixed up and can't tell who is who. The same people who think these are the same person would be shown photos of twins separately and give all the same lazy crap about aging to account for the differences yet it would be two different people. Age doesn't change your eyes, nose, lips, chin, ears, and general skull shape, height and mannerisms not in 20 years, not in 30 or 40! Certainly not in less than ONE!

    Reply
  • May 3, 2019 at 10:24 pm
    Permalink

    I noticed in interviews with Paul upto 1966 he is shy, very polite and well spoken, but after 1966 the fake Paul presents himself as cocky and arrogant, clearly not the same person/personality.

    Reply
  • May 4, 2019 at 3:08 am
    Permalink

    I guess there will always be delusional humans.

    Reply
  • May 5, 2019 at 3:41 pm
    Permalink

    Why not investigate soemthig that is actually important…..9/11…..maybe? JFK?

    Reply
  • May 12, 2019 at 2:43 pm
    Permalink

    early Paul simply bowed out, I believe is still alive and changed his name to John Holiday. Listen to Beatle interviews around 1965. Very possible, both he and John were tired of the fame ….and media and stepped out. IMO..they assisted with the Faul and Fennon switch a-roo. Pay attention to the demeanor of John Holiday (u-tube search brings up plenty), besides the uncanny resemblance, he treats people like the original Paul. ….not the latter Faul. Then pay attention to his stage presence, type of songs sung and the even way his bass guitar is held and played of early Paul VS Faul. Like it is bragged about….the bigger the lie, the more it will be believed. I would love to hear his (original Paul) story.

    Reply
  • May 14, 2019 at 4:20 pm
    Permalink

    Who can dyni there are two of them. They haven't committed a crime. No charges. Just decieved the world.

    Reply
  • May 14, 2019 at 6:33 pm
    Permalink

    BS

    Reply
  • May 14, 2019 at 11:51 pm
    Permalink

    You are the fake, spreader of disinformation. Fake news site.

    Reply
  • May 16, 2019 at 9:54 am
    Permalink

    ermm.. thats called aging

    Reply
  • May 17, 2019 at 7:59 pm
    Permalink

    William (Billy) Wallace Shepherd from the Campbell Clan in Scotland; red Paul shy and innocent looking, blue Paul dominant, outgoing and arrogant. But you have to blame it on Brian Epstein, the remaining Beatles and paid off relatives.

    Reply
  • May 17, 2019 at 9:25 pm
    Permalink

    Face doesnt change this dramatic no way its paul McCartney. How ir what happened in 1966 anyone's guess.

    Reply
  • May 19, 2019 at 4:56 am
    Permalink

    young pauls teeth changed also

    Reply
  • May 22, 2019 at 5:11 am
    Permalink

    Has anyone out there noticed that all 4 of them dont look the same.

    Reply
  • May 22, 2019 at 3:41 pm
    Permalink

    It's not just obvious in appearance that Paul was replaced but Paul had a much nicer personality than fail. Faul is very egotistical were the real Paul was very was more reserved.

    Reply
  • May 23, 2019 at 9:54 pm
    Permalink

    William Campbell Shears.

    Reply
  • May 26, 2019 at 10:16 pm
    Permalink

    where were the doctored images found?

    Reply
  • June 3, 2019 at 2:00 am
    Permalink

    Most folks will never see the truth

    Reply
  • June 5, 2019 at 9:44 pm
    Permalink

    Murder is murder!!! This is what the WASP does to WASP, what will the WASP not do to the non-WASP?

    Reply
  • June 7, 2019 at 2:06 am
    Permalink

    I loved Paul.

    Reply
  • June 7, 2019 at 2:30 am
    Permalink

    Oh dear This is a very sad waste of time. Get over yourself. Paul is Paul. Faul is a figment of your overactive imagination. That’s all you need to know.
    If you want to waste your time with this silliness, be my guest, but I’m out.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2019 at 4:41 am
    Permalink

    What is wrong with all you people? Paul McCartney did not die they did not replace him maybe this is a joke the video is a joke unbelievable I just can't believe how stupid people can be!

    Reply
  • June 8, 2019 at 8:00 pm
    Permalink

    faul is so much more creative than paul – glad paul died in 66

    Reply
  • June 8, 2019 at 10:40 pm
    Permalink

    All photos fine and same man, one older. Bet all yer pics ugly all through the years. I and most other folks had rather look at the handsome Paul than your ugly mug.

    Reply
  • June 11, 2019 at 7:52 pm
    Permalink

    This is by far the best Paul to faul video it amazes me how many ppl won't have it I've given up apparently I'm I'm the stupid one for believing what's right in ya face photos the personality change I'll have my day and I'll say who is the stupid one now you fking dumb asses

    Reply
  • June 15, 2019 at 3:45 am
    Permalink

    Thanks much I always knew the doubles was back since they started. Plus sometimes the right eyebrow is long and then becomes short with faul, plus fauls eyes looks mischievous kinda a darkness about them but Paul’s eyes are gentle looking

    Reply
  • June 15, 2019 at 3:06 pm
    Permalink

    I too got both those introductory albums at 10yrs old (50 yrs ago) Then collected all the rest.My favorite group.Your choice of comparison proof pix arent the best.Faul is Satanist.Butt kisser (Chemtrails,Obama.When hes tapped on the shoulder to sell us out.mislead…he says "how high ?do i jump..CHEMTRAILs are poison,Obama was a foreigner with allegiance to SATAN..a foreign god Little g god).Not qualified to be President..born in Kenja.Homosexual.His wife is a TG.His kids R adopted.

    Reply
  • June 16, 2019 at 5:23 pm
    Permalink

    My sister saw in 1995 a documentary about beatles and she told us Paul lokks different. My father and myself were laughing about her. Maybe she was right. He was replaced. The MI6 was involved

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 8:49 am
    Permalink

    Hey you've got a nice soft voice, but I still dont see how this is proof.
    In the photo comparisons with different angles the other beatles faces changed too, does that mean that all the beatles were replaced too?
    As for personality changes, thats just what happens when you're the one of the most famous people on the planet, you've been touring for years and you start doing drugs. That being said he is still a kind soul.

    And what are the chances that "Billy" has the same voice, the same talent and the same looks?

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 8:54 am
    Permalink

    While I don't beleive any of this I think it would make a great fictional movie

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 4:03 am
    Permalink

    All I can do is laugh when I watch these videos

    Reply
  • June 25, 2019 at 8:12 pm
    Permalink

    This is all daft get a life

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 9:40 am
    Permalink

    Same bloke. Fuck PID. Paul LIVES

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 9:43 am
    Permalink

    @2:58~same mother fucking bloke!! PIA

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 9:44 am
    Permalink

    Those photos were doctoured to support PID. The whole conspiracy is bollocks!

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 9:46 am
    Permalink

    So mate you're sayin' that Paul was "replaced" before 1966??? What drugs are you on ??

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 9:48 am
    Permalink

    Changes from 62 to 67 and beyond: maturing, diet, drug use, weight loss, the list goes on and on, man. There is absolutely no proof that MACCA was replaced, none whatsoever.

    Reply
  • July 7, 2019 at 12:51 am
    Permalink

    So faul wrote hey jude???
    loads pistol
    Well these walls need a new coat of red anyhow.

    Reply
  • July 8, 2019 at 11:03 am
    Permalink

    Paul is NOT different just older, look at photos of yourself through the ages and compare them, that is why there is a slight change over the years. Paul's eyes remain the same all through the years. I'm sure that 911 was an inside job, no-one has been to the moon, JFK wasn't killed by Lee Harvey Oswald and the earth is NOT a globe but Paul DIDN'T die in 1966 and is still the same man who lives today. All it took was a rumour and the Beatles benefitted from and played upon it ever since. What a great way to surround the band with mythos and to keep them popular. The Beatles will forever be one of the greatest bands of all time and I enjoy their music very much, sadly John was murdered and then George died but Ringo and Paul are still with us and if you believe any different you have fallen for the ploy.

    Reply
  • July 14, 2019 at 8:14 am
    Permalink

    Foul Paul is much talented than the original anyway

    Reply
  • July 21, 2019 at 7:45 am
    Permalink

    You are a deluded muppet. I suppose you are claiming his entire family also colluded in this "deception"

    Reply
  • July 21, 2019 at 9:15 am
    Permalink

    There is such thing as DNA, and his son still alive. It's your claims that really fake.

    Reply
  • July 22, 2019 at 3:47 am
    Permalink

    Wings made some great music so if this Paul is fake I'm okay with that

    Reply
  • July 25, 2019 at 6:56 pm
    Permalink

    I think this guy's having a laugh! He's taking the piss out of all you conspiracy theorists. I think he doctored those pics.

    Reply
  • July 28, 2019 at 3:10 pm
    Permalink

    I’m not Faul.

    I AM THE WALRUS

    Reply
  • July 30, 2019 at 5:43 pm
    Permalink

    Wow I never noticed. I got the same album as a Christmas present from my father.

    Reply
  • July 30, 2019 at 5:46 pm
    Permalink

    I love the first Paul much more humble angelic, and somber.

    Reply
  • July 30, 2019 at 5:47 pm
    Permalink

    6:48 Proverbs 16:30 A man who winks is plotting perversity, whomever purses their lips is bent on evil.

    Reply
  • July 31, 2019 at 12:08 pm
    Permalink

    People change‼

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 11:29 pm
    Permalink

    A Silverster Stellon clone is now Paul McCartney

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 3:56 pm
    Permalink

    GET THAT CERTIFIED OFFICIAL DEATH CERTIFICATE

    then we’ll TAKK

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 5:00 am
    Permalink

    Nice 3D. Does that not seem to show several Paul’s? 6:05. “Stupid bloody Tuesday man you let face grow long,”said John Lennon, in I am the Walrus.

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 8:18 am
    Permalink

    Bruh hes the same guy, they just got older, im pretty sure 16 you doesnt look the same as you looked when you were 18. They all look so different in the first picture, SO THEY ALL GOT CLONED? This shits dumb, beatles fan need to lay off the drugs.

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 8:27 am
    Permalink

    3:38 that one dont look at his face, he got stoner eyes thats it. But look at his hands, even his veins and knuckles they are the same shit… You guys are crazy lmao, hes definetely not a clone, he just got older. What? You lookd the same when you were 20 and when you were 23-24 face factions fucking change, lmao plus he made a lot of drugs, eyes tend to get hazy

    Reply
  • August 15, 2019 at 7:34 am
    Permalink

    There are even teenaged photos of Faul mixed in with real Paul. And what about the music! Paul and John wrote the best songs ever written and sang such beautiful close harmonies they sounded like one voice. Faul wrote garbage like Hello Goodbye and Band on the Run.

    Reply
  • September 7, 2019 at 6:53 am
    Permalink

    There's a third Paul… the Green Paul.😐

    Reply
  • September 19, 2019 at 12:23 am
    Permalink

    Don't be ridicolous and get a job! Anyone can see the face of the Queen Elisabeth on the right!… Jesus!

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 8:41 pm
    Permalink

    Thank You.
    Hopefully bill is preparing to disclose.
    This has gone on way to long.

    Reply
  • October 14, 2019 at 4:16 pm
    Permalink

    If you have nothing interesting going on in your life you probably will buy into this yea

    Reply
  • October 18, 2019 at 11:10 pm
    Permalink

    nada q ver no invente hasta l mirada es diferente y como quieran ponerla n se hagan chibolas a nadie es ignorante todo es diferente le ponen l cara alargada para q digan q es el Paul real

    Reply
  • October 22, 2019 at 8:37 pm
    Permalink

    Anyone else thinking – the two people on the right – George and John – look very different?

    I don't get the change with Paul.

    Maybe that's the real conspiracy – 'John' was about the tell us he was a fake when we was murdered in 1980. And was George going to do the same before he tragically died of cancer in 2001?

    Reply
  • October 23, 2019 at 12:27 pm
    Permalink

    Do you actually think John and George would let their best friend be buried beneath an unmarked grave?

    Reply
  • November 2, 2019 at 7:54 pm
    Permalink

    This is just sick!

    Reply
  • November 8, 2019 at 11:57 pm
    Permalink

    Anybody who thinks it's a different Paul wake up you can get a nose job eyes done ears your chin so it's the same guy one Paul.

    Reply
  • November 9, 2019 at 8:33 am
    Permalink

    even at that time there was technology to alter photos to make faul look more like paul, so why wouldn't they? Because it's just paul on a different day.

    Reply
  • November 12, 2019 at 6:23 am
    Permalink

    Come on camera angles. Paul gained weight and lost weight like everyone else. Ears and nose continues to grow throughout your life time. This is total nonsense.

    Reply
  • November 20, 2019 at 3:09 pm
    Permalink

    The Memoirs of Billy Shears guys, he lays it all out in it. I'm halfway through the first one (red cover) and when I'm finished that one I'm gonna order the second one (blue cover). For anyone who has an interest and is on the fence about it, order a copy, I promise you, you won't be disappointed. I haven't put it down since it was delivered.

    Reply
  • November 23, 2019 at 6:45 am
    Permalink

    Fake faul gave up his life to become Paul, it’s sad Paul’s dead! Can you imagine how people would go wild if told he died? Mass histeria, ! Around the world ! Fake faul had stood in for Paul before, All the groups had their members doubles, so handy if they want a night off! Screaming fans don’t see! You cannot hear the songs because they are screaming!
    Faul it’s horrible that he does not get any credit for songs he wrote !! By hiding this I think they’ve created a Pandora’s box !! But Faul is more than a Beatle than Paul is, all these years ago ! Let it go !!

    Reply
  • November 25, 2019 at 8:25 pm
    Permalink

    I don't think any PiD researcher can conclusively say they have doctored the early photos of Paul to look like Faul without any proof. It's easy to say photoshop, but unless you have access to original photos (which you can find from old magazines printed back in the day, and some have them showing the same facial differences) then photo manipulation is just an opinion. There is evidence that there have been two or maybe more than two people playing the part of Paul McCartney, and these can be seen going right back to the Beatles early pre fame days and into post Faul years. All show the same difference in eye brows, facial shape, nose shape, height etc. The differences are very subtle but still convincing enough to pass off as one person, so much so that youd think Paul had a twin brother (or maybe he was a quadruple?). But there's no evidence that Paul was one of twins, so who the hell are these people who look remarkably like one another?. Was Paul a clone of someone, maybe someone from our historical past?.

    Reply
  • November 27, 2019 at 1:01 am
    Permalink

    Without a shadow of a doubt the Beatles were an illusion and there were 2 or more Paul’s . If the Beatles were as authentic as you thought then how come their songs were leased to many groups in the 60’s even while the Beatles version would still be on the radio? How do you sell song rights to other groups if your a group ? You don’t but your handlers do , and that’s PROOF that Lennon and McCartney did not right all those songs but a catalog of songs already existed .

    Reply
  • November 28, 2019 at 3:44 pm
    Permalink

    If he was replaced then faul wrote better songs, there later stuff was better

    Reply
  • November 29, 2019 at 4:57 am
    Permalink

    No one says anything about the actual composition style which is something that cant be faked. Learn an instrument play beatles songs and youll find the truth. I did

    Reply
  • December 1, 2019 at 12:10 pm
    Permalink

    after meke baronets by the royal evry tink change mmmmmmmmmmm

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *