Fake photo flop & Driving blind!

Fake photo flop & Driving blind!


(upbeat music) Jean Floramund. Yeah, that’s it. Jean Floramund. So you have a red light violation on Broad and Baker. We’re going to look at it. What do you want to tell me about this? I work for a post office, so I know a lot about safety. Safety depends on me, and I always try to make sure every time I step behind a vehicle to make it back home the same way I stepped inside of it. And I think that night, I just got off the highway, I had my glasses inside my lunch bag and the case, so I didn’t have my glasses on. And I remember working late that night. I think I worked at least 11 hours and 30-something minutes that day, from being on my feet all day. Sometimes when I drive, my right foot gets a little… It can get a little… If you drive from long distance throughout the day, especially if you’re driving consistently throughout the day for work, you can get a little ankle ache every now and then. You had an ankle ache in your left foot? No, my right foot, my driving foot. Oh, your right foot. Yeah, ’cause I go up and down stairs every day. That’s all I do is just deliver mail every day for 10 hours on a day-to-day basis. My intention was to stop, I just didn’t stop in time. All right, all right, all right, listen. I’m going to look at the video again. Inspector Quinn, did you notice that he stopped after he went through the light? Yes your Honor, it’s probably a typical millennial move, looking down at the phone, going through the light, realize it, “Oh shoot,” and then hit the brakes. That’s probably where it started. It’s just a mistake, Judge. The camera caught him, I don’t know what else to say. What do you have to say to what Inspector Quinn’s presuming, that you were looking down at your cell phone? I say you’re 99.9 right, if anything. Wow, could you say that again, please, so everyone could hear it? You were looking down at your cell phone? My only intention was to not run the light, but then screech in the middle of the street after– My question was, were you looking at your cell phone? Yeah. You were?
Yeah. I plead the fifth. Not withstanding everything you told me, let’s assume that a child was crossing the street at that point. Inspector Quinn, your recommendation. Your Honor, the video speaks for itself. I’m sure the motorist did not intend to do that, he was not at a high rate of speed or anything. He did slow down afterwards. $75. Thank you, your Honor. Juan Gonzalez. Mr. Gonzalez, you’re charged with parking Salina Street. Yes. Was it overnight parking? No, parking in a prohibited area on Salina Street. I always park there, I even have a picture of my landlord’s daughter who, her husband parks there. Show it to Inspector Quinn. The question is whether or not there was a sign that says no parking. No, there’s no sign. Hands out of your pockets, please. Oh, yeah. Take your hands out of your pockets. Oh, my hands? Oh, sorry.
Thanks. Is this your car?
No. Oh, this is not your car. No, that’s the landlord’s daughter’s car. Landlord’s daughter? Oh, the landlord’s daughter is parked on the sidewalk. That’s a hundred dollar ticket. Did you see that? Hands out of your pockets. It’s a habit.
I know. Let me explain something to you. I’m not trying to embarrass you, but you have to answer this question for me, okay? Sure. You were charged with parking in a prohibited area, right? So you come to court, and I understand that, because if it feels as though you’re right, you should come in and say, “I’m right,” okay. But you submitted a photograph as evidence, right? Yeah, there’s other ones too. You submit a photograph as evidence, right? You submitted this photograph. Yes. Now, you know that signs are usually on a pole that’s eight feet high, right? Yes, there’s no signs though. I understand that, I understand that. So you submit to me a photo that doesn’t show anything above six feet, and it’s just limited to an area of about 30 feet. If there was a sign, would it be visible in this photograph, if there was? If there was, no.
No. So why do you submit this photograph as your evidence? Because to show that–
Why don’t you show me an area, show me where there’s no poles and no signs. This has no significance. All right, you show me a car parked on a sidewalk. There could be a sign on the pole that says no parking. You’re here for no parking. You’re not here to show me a picture of somebody else parked on a sidewalk. I didn’t know, it was my first time doing this. So I wouldn’t know about where to take a picture at. I’m not trying to trick you or embarrass you. To me, I’m saying you take all morning, you come into court, you say “I’m going to try to convince the judge that I’m right,” right? “I’m going to show the judge that there’s no sign that says I can’t park there.” so you don’t take any photographs that would explain to me that there’s no sign there that I can see. This photograph shows nothing. You could have taken a photograph of the ceiling, you would have had the same effect, right? I’m trying to educate you that in the unlikely event that you ever get another parking ticket, in the event that you want to contest that parking ticket, I strongly suggest that you take photographs that would address the issue of the charge against you. Inspector Carriger.
Yes. Did you understand that? Your explanation? Yes.
Yes. Usually it’s convoluted. Okay, if you understand it, then I think he should understand it. Everybody will if I can, your Honor. (laughs) All right, Juan. Now that I’ve berated you somewhat, it’s been your first parking ticket, so I’m going to give you a break on it. Cool.
Okay? Thank you. I’m going to sentence you to photography lessons. That seems reasonable. Good luck. Come on, how cool was that? If you’d like to see more cases like this one, tune in to Caught in Providence every weekday. Excuse me? You didn’t know Caught in Providence is also a TV show? Oh wow, your life just got substantially better! To find out what channel we’re on, go to caughtinprovidence.com, click on your local listings, scroll down until you find your hometown, then start doing your happy dance. That’s it, move it, move it! Nice. All rise and hit subscribe so you don’t miss the latest viral moments like this one. Share these videos and weigh in on the cases. You be the judge! Subscribe now.

41 thoughts on “Fake photo flop & Driving blind!

  • August 6, 2019 at 9:01 pm
    Permalink

    First

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:02 pm
    Permalink

    second

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:03 pm
    Permalink

    Third

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:09 pm
    Permalink

    Hey guys my ginea pig speeded can I please get a discount on the speeding bill because he is a cute pet

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:11 pm
    Permalink

    Stop looking at your phone when you’re behind the wheel, for the first guy. The second guy is a bit immature and looks clueless to getting better evidence in photos

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:12 pm
    Permalink

    5th

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:12 pm
    Permalink

    yep, cool, ya who will reply to Judge like that, second person doesn’t deserve to be on tv

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:13 pm
    Permalink

    Excuse after Excuse yeah your right 99.9 % right # judge were u on your phn yeah isn't that 100% 🙄

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:15 pm
    Permalink

    Yeahh I run a red light??🤯

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:24 pm
    Permalink

    I watch on YouTube because I don't have a tv :😁 so i happy dance whenever you post a video 🙂

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:25 pm
    Permalink

    Photographers are very mean
    First they frame you
    Then they shoot you
    Then they hang you on the wall

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:30 pm
    Permalink

    Do people like the second guy – even for an instant – realize how ignorant they sound and how poorly they present themselves? And did he even think for a second how he would look and sound when he signed the video release form? Now the whole world knows about Juan. Think, Man! You got on TV and YouTube for this kind of publicity?

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 9:41 pm
    Permalink

    2nd guy got lucky, the judge should've jacked him up for his bad attitude.

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 10:00 pm
    Permalink

    Case no. 1 — looking at phone while entering intersection causing him not to see the red light (and possibly pedestrians) — he should be hung,drawn and quartered. There is no excuse for such egregious behaviour. Only $75 fine. Ridiculous! That is pandering to lawbreakers. Looking at or even using cell-phones whilst driving MUST be given much greater penalties.

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 10:24 pm
    Permalink

    Just when I thought Ziggy was merely speculating… I got so swiftly corrected…. Ziggy's insight and investigative tactics are AWESOME

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 10:26 pm
    Permalink

    I like this show….the old people with stories are interesting. Funny too

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 10:37 pm
    Permalink

    Case number one: Excuses, excuses, excuses… If you're not feeling that well, you shouldn't be driving. And cell phone watching? Too many folks have died or have been injured permanently because of selfish people like that! SMH!

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 11:35 pm
    Permalink

    I love to see judge caprio be a less lenient

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 11:38 pm
    Permalink

    Do you know what you do for me Your honor, because of you compassion and love for people, especially those certain few cases that are truly in need, your spirit and attitude motivate me to be a better Pastor and a better person, thank you judge Caprio

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 1:15 am
    Permalink

    inspector carigan can choke me

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 1:23 am
    Permalink

    dunkey wtf did you do

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 1:45 am
    Permalink

    Why no hands in pockets? What’s that all about

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 2:05 am
    Permalink

    The first guy confused me because he said that he worked 11.5 hrs in his feet and then he was driving and when you drive for a long time for work you get a foot cramp….he was trying to lie and got busted …smh

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 2:54 am
    Permalink

    2nd guy was a major jerk, he didn't deserve the brake the judge gave him, you could see he was not impressed at all at the gesture given… millenials…

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 2:57 am
    Permalink

    اللّهمّ حبّب الإسلام إلى القاضي Caprio وزيٌنه في قلبه.. آمين

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 3:25 am
    Permalink

    People just cruising through red lights, and making no attempt to slow down, generally don't deserve a break. Especially if they are the phone while driving.

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 4:01 am
    Permalink

    Youtube suggests me this video. but I just don't understand why they open a court for cases like these. I don't know the rule here. Could anyone explain for me, please?

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 4:36 am
    Permalink

    Why the 'tude from Quinn @ 3:58??!?!

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 6:21 am
    Permalink

    Does he think 11hours is abnormal shift?

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 7:03 am
    Permalink

    Wow. That first guy is a first class BS artist! First, he starts off by saying how knowledgeable he is about safety and how he always does everything possible to ensure that he gets from point A to point B safely, but then immediately goes on to admit that A. He wasn't wearing his glasses. B. He was looking down at his cell phone while driving. GUILTY!!!! The second guy is just a blatant moron and his attitude sucked. You never respond to a judge with, "Cool." Dumbass. I would have fined him for his attitude and his sheer idiocy.

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 11:23 am
    Permalink

    I'm embarrassed for this first guy. His excuse is horrifying. Please stop!!

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 1:15 pm
    Permalink

    Courts, lawyers, judges are just actors. They are not real, the BAR is from another country, the United States is not a country it’s a service corporation doing business on my ancestors land.

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 2:25 pm
    Permalink

    the first guy should have been punished more for his reckless behavior..

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 3:26 pm
    Permalink

    Ok. So the first guy said he didn't see the road because he didn't have glasses on (smart), he had driven for so long that his foot hurt (smart), that he was looking at his phone (smart)… 🙄

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 4:23 pm
    Permalink

    Juan was a complete moron. Needs to get some brain cells with those photography lessons.

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 7:02 pm
    Permalink

    "Is this your caaaaa" ?

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 9:12 pm
    Permalink

    Your ankle ache is between your ears. What a sad a story. WRONG !!!

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 1:53 pm
    Permalink

    This is great court can be very intimidating for most people including myself no matter what capacity. Seeing a judge live up to his title as your honor and making light-hearted of certain events is a wonderful reassuring aspect of the judicial system. God bless you judge and your many years to come.🏛️👍

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 3:04 pm
    Permalink

    this negro guy doesnt know bounderieswd=as

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 7:01 pm
    Permalink

    That first guy was gonna have his ticket dismissed with his ankle story… until he admitted that he was on his cell phone, then the judge ordered him to pay the fine.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *